I find immense irony in the fact that while frogs and trees are married to each other to please the rain gods in all religious glory, sexual minorities aren’t even recognized, forget being allowed to marry.
Where else can you find such bizarreness ?
There were quite a few gay pride parades in India this weekend, which were moderate successes. Meanwhile, the issue over 377 lies pending in the Delhi HC and should be coming up for hearing in July. The law minister M. Oily (or Moily) was initially in favour of a review of the archaic law, but later chickened out as reactions started pouring in.
The government has, instead, called for a debate on the issue :
On Sunday, Moily sounded more cautious. He told reporters in Thiruvananthapuram that concerns of all section of society, including religious leaders, will be taken into account.
This makes as much sense as Sidhu’s metaphors.
Now among vocal protestors are religious and political conservatives :
The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) has opposed any dilution in section 377. The VHP’s Delhi unit spokesman, Vinod Bansal, said: “It [homosexuality] is against the culture and family system in India. It will result in the spread of a number of diseases.”
and death by diease, as we know, is a strict no-no. Death, however, by a trishul during riots is kosher.
Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, a leading body of Muslims in the country, said the repeal of section 377 would create “sexual anarchy” in society.
Given the current plight of Muslims and the percentage of terrorists being Muslims, I would be glad if such distractions were introduced.
The Church has also opposed the move. “The Church’s stand on the issue has always been clear. For us it is an unnatural act, against the divine law. We will definitely oppose it,”
unless, of course, sodomy involves religious figures.
The BJP also voiced its reservations. Party leader Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi said: “We are living in India, not in an European country.”
and as we know, humans in India are altogether different from those in Europe. Find irony in the fact that 377 was a product of the British rule, who have proceeded to saner laws.
CPI(M) politburo member MK Pandhe said his party “doesn’t support homosexuality”. But he refused to comment about section 377, saying “our party has not discussed the matter [yet]“.
to be read as, “We are not yet sure what China’s stand on the issue is”.
Just like I have proven time and again that you don’t need to be a woman to be a hardcore feminist, it is time we voiced our opinion on this issue (assuming the opinion makes sense) even though it may not concern us.
The bottomline for a law should be this : If you don’t bother anyone, the government shouldn’t bother you.