Posted by: Deepak Iyer | June 29, 2009

Of banning attires.

Recently, French President Nicholas Sarkozy effected a ban on the burqaNot to be left behind, the Sena supremo has made a similar demand for India.

Which brings me to another thought.

If the burqa is to be banned, why not the sari ? If the burqa is a sign of subservience, so is the sari in many households. If you argue that a lot of women wear the sari out of preference, the same can be argued of the burqa, I believe.

Okay maybe they are slightly different, but I am extrapolating.


Responses

  1. The burqa debarrs a woman from interacting with the rest of the world normally. And vice versa.

    The sari is a piece of clothing like any other. Makes you look good. Covers you up. Protects you form the weather.

    I really dont know why you would make that comparison. Coz by your logic, we should ban all clothing and run around naked.

  2. @Aarti : I have mentioned that the comparison to a sari is unfair and extrapolated.

    I do not agree with banning the burqa coz it should be left to an individual. All I wanted to say is that I am sure there are more than a few Muslim women who would want to wear the burqa out of their own will.


Leave a response

Your response:

Categories