Thanks to my friend Amit K. who works at Google, I got an invite to try out Google Wave quite early. There’s been a lot of anticipation and excitement about Wave ever since it was showcased as a conference. To add to it, they were only going to roll it out to 100,000 users in the first round, so the internet has been abuzz with articles about Wave since yesterday.
Here’s my first impression of it.
I still don’t see its point.
It would be unfair to say that Google claimed so, but most tech-watchers expected Wave to be the next big form of communication combining elements of existing social networking paradigms in a brand new interface. That doesn’t happen with Wave.
You have gadgets like maps, polls, etc. for multiple users to collaborate in a single Wave. I don’t see how it is better than using existing services like Gmail, which gives a far superior experience IMHO. If you want users to switch to you, you need to offer something substantially better in terms of quality, user experience, scalability, etc. That is one of the reasons Bing failed big time. You remember Bing, right ?
For normal chats, don’t even think of Wave. It is an overkill in terms of time and performance. I ended up liking Gtalk more after the Wave exercise !
It is too bling and heavy for my liking, so I’m not sure I’d be using it a lot.
It also crashed multiple times, but it’s only fair to give that to Google, since they had just started rolling it out for testing.
I think Wave is trying to solve a problem I am not sure it knows. Or it expects us to figure out the problem. I found many friends coming up with new scenarios where Wave might be useful – people are coming up with problems for which Wave is a solution. That isn’t very healthy for a product, in my humble opinion.
Still, I wouldn’t be foolish to write it off. We need to follow how it converges in terms of usage, see some applications built on the Wave API come forth before deciding its fate.
Meanwhile, let’s wait and watch as any wise person would do.
P.S. : An interesting fact that a friend mentioned while talking about Wave. He said the last superb product that Google came out with, was in 2003, with GMail. I might add Google Reader here, since I use it a lot. But interesting fact, no ? I hadn’t realized this till he mentioned it.


I agree, the chatting experience is not great. But lets give it time. If something like Twitter, with such a simple interface and simple API can be so useful, u ever know…
someone, somewhere, sometime, might just come up with a great way to use Wave
BTW, in our last Wave, I said i was on the iPhone, u said the iPhone is a Phone. What i meant to say is that, I was waving ON the iPhone
By: Ady on October 2, 2009
at 4:47 am
I have a sandbox account and did some chat on Google wave last month. I did not understand what I should be doing with that. U are right, its all “bling”. I love gmail labs.
While I was using it, all I could see was users asking what is this wave useful for and how to use it..
By: Dheeraj on October 2, 2009
at 7:10 am
@Ady : Yes I realized that after checking out your blog post [:)]
If Wave in its current form is not too useful, I wonder if we were being stupid by getting excited over its release. Like you said, the apps are the thing that might power it through.
@Dheeraj : Exactly, people thinking about how they can use a product is not a very good thing. I would’ve quoted some other recent examples that use intuitive user experience, but I don’t want any mention of the company here [:)]
By: Deepak Iyer on October 2, 2009
at 5:32 pm
Deepak,
First of all, Im not a lucky member of the first 100,000 users to ‘taste’ Wave. I can’t comment on the performance of the tool but being an ardent follower and user of Google products and having seen the video of Wave demo, I wud like to differ on ur say of –
“..I think Wave is trying to solve a problem I am not sure it knows. Or it expects us to figure out the problem. I found many friends coming up with new scenarios where Wave might be useful – people are coming up with problems for which Wave is a solution. That isn’t very healthy for a product, in my humble opinion…”
The intercepting reply concept for mails in Wave is unique and much desired one. There are times when most of us hv faced difficulty in composing reply with answers to multiple and compound queries in an easily readable manner for the recipient.
Haven’t we wished there was a feature in the chat engines, that gives the history of chat when a third person is invited to the already ongoing conversation…? Wave addresses this! The playback option of history conversation for that third person in the sequential order is just mind boggling.
Above ones are just 2 examples to say that Wave has not given solutions to us to figure out the problems. It does precisely know the problems it is addressing…
Since u hv used Wave, I wanna know ur opinion on above mentioned features…
By: Anantha on October 8, 2009
at 1:22 am
not related to wave…
also don’t know if you are aware of this one –
http://www.etiole.com/
A good tech blog by a 13 year old…
By: mukta on October 26, 2009
at 12:24 am
@Anantha : Yes those are good features, but I don’t need them. I fail to see how anyone would need them on a daily basis either.
Maybe we can continue this discussion once you get your Wave invite [:)].
@Mukta : Great initiative by the 13-year old (the main authors are professionals, from what I saw) and respect for him for his achievements.
But honestly speaking, I don’t think the content is great [:)]
By: Deepak Iyer on October 26, 2009
at 12:39 am
I am no judge of the content
You might like this for some reason…
http://www.livemint.com/2009/10/23223708/The-8216next8217-Steve-J.html
By: mukta on October 26, 2009
at 12:56 am
@Mukta : No thanks again [:)].
I’d give him about 10 more years before concluding anything.
(Without denying his current achievements.)
By: Deepak Iyer on October 26, 2009
at 1:00 am
tch tch… poor Monik
By: mukta on October 26, 2009
at 1:07 am