A model commits suicide in Mumbai, and her ex-bf (who was blamed in the suicide note) is a suspect. ToI has a fine bit for not-blaming the bf:
Don’t blame the man if a woman commits suicide, there may be more to their broken relationship, says study. After supermodel Viveka Babaji left a suicide note on Friday blaming boyfriend Gautam Vora for driving her to end her life, Gautam has become the focus of Viveka’s suicide case. Neighbours in the Bandra apartment block heard the couple fighting late on Thursday night. And the last entry in Viveka’s diary allegedly reads, “You killed me Gautam Vora.” But does that incriminate Gautam in an abetment of suicide case under Section 306 of the IPC? It should be noted that Viveka, according to her elder sister Vineeta, had attempted suicide before, and was known to be hyper-sensitive, emotional, given to manic depressions, and lived a model’s life that flirted with drugs and alcohol abuse, loneliness, bad and broken relationships, the stress of insecurities and competition. Should then a man be held responsible for a woman’s suicide? Gautam has even denied his relationship with the former model.
Well-reasoned, nice argument.
It is then followed by:
Debate: Should a man be held responsible for a woman’s death, in circumstances like these?
That’s the classic Arnab Goswami style of debate, where the conclusion is drawn before the debate.

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 2, 2010 at 8:45 pm
ARUNAA ERANDE
media ready to hang anyone for TRP. and then they can say we were only giving alternatives!! of course Arnab takes the toast!.the way he gets exited about anything will teach even a consummate actor a trick or two.
September 7, 2010 at 12:33 pm
Adrian
Arnab Goswami is a first class example of a mediocre having an opinion and rendering judgments on issues which he cannot even fathom. Shame on the Times Group, the Media fraternity and the ill informed people of this country to allow this incompetent person hold daily media trials and deliver judgements all in the name of debate. Any other contry and he would have been tried for subversion of media and abuse of journalistic freedom. Height of complacence on the part of TOI group to be tolerating such inaptitude and callousness.
October 16, 2010 at 10:08 pm
k k garg
Without Arnab Goswami ,indian media will be without a heart and soul.He is a human being who is pained at seeing the injustice around. It was because of him that Jessica killer and Ruchika molester are behind the bars. your very intelligent anchors on the TV are intelligent enough to calculate their benifits before taking sides. May God empower Arnab .
November 25, 2010 at 1:32 am
arnab
Arnab has limited intelligence but he is succeeding because he divides and rules. Our politicians who come to such debates are so much involved in scoring points over each other that they don’t realize how arnab is using them to earn his lively hood and garner money for his channel.
At the end of the day, arnab is not honest, he is biased and he is not doing anything for the people of this country but for himself. But he makes everyone believe that he is there for a bigger cause.
November 7, 2011 at 8:40 am
Guddu
First class Schmuk no wonder he is considerded to be completely unneutral.He never agrees his guest or person opinions, he even doesn’t give them chance to speak.Someone should render him to stop his lunatic news hour debates.