Microsoft designer Joe Fletcher makes some interesting observations about the state of design in India:
In interviewing people thus far there have been three points that have so far come forward
1. The “Does it work?” principle: This appears to be the strongest rationale the attributes to the lack of detail I discuss above. In talking with designers in India they stressed that with Indian culture, given their daily life, the details are often a luxury. For example, in the morning they must think of how to get work, making food, washing clothes, getting fresh water, and taking kids to school among other things. Simply from a cultural and living conditions standpoint there is a strong focus on getting by. Details are a luxury that many don’t have in this society. Europe and America have the basics taken care of, which allows them to culturally focus on the details of what a water bottle looks like, having a specific cut to jeans, or separate forks for salad, soup, and cereal.
2. Schools have become a common thread in most of my interviews. For the most part I’ve only found three schools named when discussing design and user experience specifically, with the National Institute of Design (NID) being the top. This school was more of less started by C&R Eames during their work with the Indian government. Secondarily within schools that exist for teaching design, there appears to be a lack of process and design thinking, with a stronger weight on the final product. This type of oversight may account for the lack of innovative software UX. In the end, there just isn’t a strong student community or education around design, which would then carry into the workforce culture.
3. As a last and very logical point, we just haven’t used India as a country to outsource software and technology design experiences, so there has been no reason for them to exercise that muscle, as a result, it’s never been grown. The corollary I was presented with when talking with a designer in India was to think of UX in the US around the 1980’s. It was there, but just barely. It had just started to be cultivated as a solid field.
In the end, we’re asking India to apply Western techniques that have been developed from specific cultural surroundings but have never been part of daily life in their culture. While we tend to overlook it, when I hear people talk about it, it’s almost a “duh, how did I miss that” moment. To be reminded of this, has certainly been an eye opener.
(His third point sounds patronizing, but I chose to take away what he was trying to say as opposed to how it sounds literally.)
Perhaps designers or those familiar with the design sub-culture in India will disagree with these points (or even take offense). As a layman though, they seem like fair observations to me.
***
What are the examples of good design you have seen growing up in India?
Many of our traditional products had good design that evolved over centuries. Among commercial products, I liked the basic Bata slippers. Any products you can think of?
***
I don’t think minimalism in design is always the right path, but I found that all products that I like to use and whose design I can recall as being good, have been minimalist.
Link via Girish.

10 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 31, 2011 at 9:42 pm
Divya
“Bata” is not an Indian company
March 31, 2011 at 11:38 pm
iyerdeepak
I know, I didn’t mean to say otherwise
March 31, 2011 at 10:28 pm
aruna
the point made in the third para though is very valid, related to Indian psyche. We tend to learn and do only something that is profitable. the aesthetics, beauty, design etc. are the unnecessary frill and waste of time according to the new IT generation.
they are becoming totally devoid of emotions, feelings and enjoyment of life.
March 31, 2011 at 11:39 pm
iyerdeepak
That’s interesting. I would say that the newer generation can afford to indulge in aesthetics and beauty because they have their bottomline taken care of. They don’t need to worry about supporting families, etc. which folks from the previous generation had to do.
April 2, 2011 at 7:18 am
Anonymous
actually the rat race and the insecurity of the job etc. doesn’t leave any free time i suppose. also the ambitions!
April 4, 2011 at 10:59 am
girlonthebridge
I don’t know about good design but I often think about the classic potato chip packet. Easy to open in the US, really hard in India – in that, you just don’t know. Will it open easily. Is there a tear? Do I need scissors? I know this is opposite of what you asked but I am writing to point something else out. How humans evolve based on the design. I saw an article in a local US paper about how kids nowadays are “dumber” (one didn’t know what to do with a can opener, had never seen one ) – and how the ease of design has made them less resourceful. On the other hand my mom from India struggles with the simplest peanut packet in the airplane. She is used to stuff being wrestled with to open so doesn’t even look for the inevitable arrow. But lastly one thing I do think is this – with packet design, cutting something open with scissors is the most scalable and predictable. So it makes me wonder the goal of good design is. Design can be easy but I’ve seen the cleverest and easiest of things throw me off.
April 4, 2011 at 11:42 am
iyerdeepak
Airtight packets are my favourite pet peeve examples for bad design in India. Even those imported and sold in the US have the same bad design. You cannot rip it off, you can rarely use the sawteeth to tear it open, and usually you end up needing a scissor.
The fact that bad design made people think harder is incidental. That’s like saying the holocaust brought the population of Germany under control. Alright, sorry
If you want to teach kids engineering, buy games designed to teach them.
To me, design has got to be good. No compromises.
April 4, 2011 at 11:55 am
girlonthebridge
No I agree – I don’t think designers should take the easy way out. Was making an observation about how there is a difference between good design and then good design that’s really scalable. that’s all. i once read in a book how a scientist marveled at the umbrella – how complete an invention it is and how it would never evolve further. They are the same everywhere. Hopefully that comes to peanut packets soon
April 4, 2011 at 12:02 pm
iyerdeepak
Very interesting. I’ve been thinking about the umbrella for a few mins. If I can think of any other design, I’ll share it. But seeing that someone more knowledgeable than me concluded that it is perfect, I don’t have much hope.
April 4, 2011 at 12:16 pm
girlonthebridge
Haha. It was a fiction book, and an observation by a fictional scientist. Sorry for being misleading. Go forth and think!